background image blur
background image
  • Blog
    >
  • News
    >
  • Indonesia Bans Social Media for Under 16s, Calls It a "Digital Emergency"

Indonesia Bans Social Media for Under 16s, Calls It a "Digital Emergency"

Dominykas Zukas author photo
By Tech Writer and Security Investigator Dominykas Zukas
clock icon
Last updated: 6 March, 2026
Mom and son in Indonesia are sitting at home at the table, setting up the son's phone for the age verification

Governments have figured out that "protect the children" is the one political argument that shuts down almost every objection. It's been the operating framework for digital legislation across the world over the past year, with the “act now, think later” strategy at its helm every single time. And naturally, the fact that this very likely might be more harmful than helpful to anyone is something to be considered in the latter phase.

Today, Indonesia becomes the latest newcomer to the children safety “superhero” club, as its Communications and Digital Affairs Minister Meutya Hafid signed a new government regulation banning children under 16 from holding accounts on any high-risk digital platform. TikTok, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, X, Bigo Live, and Roblox are all named. Enforcement starts March 28, rolling out in phases until all platforms have met their compliance obligations.

The Platforms on the Chopping Block

The regulation operates on a tiered system under Government Regulation No. 17/2025, known as PP Tunas. Children under 13 are limited exclusively to platforms designed for their age group. Those aged 13 to 15 may only access platforms classified as low risk. Anyone under 16 on a high-risk platform gets their account deactivated, and parental consent is required across both younger age brackets.

Risk classification is based on factors like exposure to strangers, violent or pornographic content, and addictive features, which is how YouTube, TikTok, and Roblox all end up in the same bucket. The scope also goes further than Australia's ban: Indonesia's regulation extends to e-commerce platforms and online games, not just social media.

One thing to consider is the scale. Indonesia has roughly 280 million people, internet penetration hit 79.5% in 2024, and 48% of children under 12 already have internet access. Account removals will happen in phases starting with major platforms, which still means tens of millions of accounts.

One More Country Reciting the Same Script

Indonesia is now the first country in Southeast Asia to restrict children's social media access and the first non-Western country to implement age-based platform restrictions at this scale. Australia got there first in December 2025, and social media companies there have already revoked roughly 4.7 million accounts identified as belonging to minors. Spain, France, Austria, Malaysia, and the UK are all either implementing or actively considering the same measures.

Minister Hafid described the situation as a "digital emergency" and said the government was acting to "reclaim sovereignty over children's futures." That phrasing deserves more scrutiny than it typically gets. Sovereignty over children's futures is a genuinely enormous claim, and building the technical apparatus to enforce it requires something specific: the ability to verify who every user actually is.

That's the part nobody in government likes to talk about plainly. Every one of these bans requires age verification, and age verification means identity collection. Whether children should be shielded from algorithmic exploitation is not a hard question, and I'd argue firmly they should. But that's not what's being built, and that’s the real digital emergency.

The Infrastructure Outlasts the Children

Indonesia's regulation is framed as child protection. France's was too, and within weeks of its social media ban passing, a government minister was already publicly floating restrictions on VPNs because teenagers were using them to circumvent the age limit. Australia's laws became a live blueprint for mandatory identity verification across the entire internet, not just for minors, not just for social media.

Minister Hafid said the government is stepping in "so that parents no longer have to fight alone against the giant of algorithms." So, then, why does fighting the algorithms cost every person their digital privacy, while the algorithms, the ones we’re fighting, remain untouched?

I'd believe that framing more if the solution didn't require every Indonesian under 16 to be formally identified and removed from the digital public square. Building a national identity checkpoint and calling it child safety is the oldest trick in the digital governance book, and Indonesia just ran it to the letter.


Share on
Facebook share Twitter share Reddit share Linkedin share

Be part of the resistance, quietly.

Get Mysterium VPN Arrow icon
awareness campaign banner img
Dominykas Zukas author photo
Dominykas Zukas
Tech Writer and Security Investigator

Dominykas is a technical writer with a mission to bring you information that will help you in keeping your digital privacy and security protected at all times. If there's knowledge that can help keep you safe online, Dominykas will be there to cover it.

Read more by this author
© Copyright 2026 UAB "MN Intelligence"